我曾在一个问答网站上看到，有人将《刺客信条》系列定义为“看风景游戏”。在他看来，这类游戏“内容雷同、系统守旧、游戏性平平”，除了风景好看，几乎没什么长处。这个观点我断然是无法赞同的。我觉得《刺客信条》相当好玩（黑旗除外，我从来就开不好任何船），当然，我并不想试图说服任何人。但那个网友至少说对了一件事 ——《刺客信条》系列的风景，真的很好看。现在的游戏普遍注重画面，而有一些游戏则在这方面做得更为突出：这些游戏不但视角效果出色，更是让玩家在游玩的过程中，得以领略来自世界各地、乃至时间长河中各个阶段的不胜美景。我觉得吧，在传统RPG/ACT/FPS等游戏分类已经不能很好地起到概括作用的当下，我们不如...
I have seen on a q&a site, some series of assassin's creed is defined as "scenery". "In his view, this kind of game content is similar, conservative, gameplay flatly", in addition to the scenery beautiful, almost no strength. I flatly can't agree with this view. I feel pretty fun assassin's creed (except the black flag, I can't never open any ship), of course, I don't want to try to convince anyone. But the netizens said at least one thing - series of assassin's creed scenery, is really very good. Now game is generally pay attention to the screen, while there are some games in this aspect is more prominent: these games not only the perspective effect is good, is to let the player in the process of play, to enjoy from all over the world, and even during the long time at various stages of beauty. I think, in the traditional RPG/ACT/FPS games classification generalization effect is not well, why don't we...
